Do Annual Performance Reviews Actually Improve Anything at Work?

If you have ever worked in a structured workplace, chances are you have experienced at least one annual performance review. Some employees have been through many. But the real question is this — do annual reviews actually improve anything, or are they just formalities to satisfy human resources policies?

Most reviews follow the same formula. You are asked to rate yourself across a list of broad categories — communication, productivity, teamwork, leadership, customer service, and the ever-present “exceeding expectations.” These terms may sound impressive, but what do they actually mean?

Take “exceeding expectations,” for example. If you are a delivery driver, does exceeding expectations mean delivering packages in half the time — even if it means speeding or ignoring safety protocols? If you are a nurse or doctor, does it mean doubling patient loads or rushing through procedures? Without context, these phrases are vague and potentially meaningless.

Self-assessments often feel like a guessing game. Employees are expected to evaluate themselves using generic criteria that apply to nearly every industry. Yet the people asking for these assessments — the managers and team leaders — have been observing employee performance all year. Should they not already know who is performing well and who needs support?

There is also an important piece missing from most review forms — employee feedback. Rarely is there space to discuss pay raises, promotional opportunities, or the actual challenges faced during the year. There is seldom a chance to speak honestly without fear of negative consequences. Instead, most reviews are reduced to paperwork, polite conversations, and the hope that nothing controversial will be said.

In theory, performance reviews should help identify strengths, address weaknesses, and support career growth. But in practice, they are often a checkbox activity — something to complete before the end of the year. They rarely lead to real change or meaningful recognition.

If companies want performance reviews to matter, they must go beyond vague language and ratings. Reviews should be grounded in actual work, provide space for honest dialogue, and lead to real outcomes — not just a completed form.

Otherwise, the process risks becoming what many already suspect — a time-consuming ritual that changes nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Categories

Aussie Magpie Swooping Season: A Survival Guide

Is the 50-Cent Public Transport Fare in Queensland Worth It?